He is a distinguished graduate of West Point U. Military Academy , where he majored in quantitative economics. George Mehok is the chief information officer for Safeguard. He is responsible for all strategic technology decisions, new systems deployments and data center operations supporting a national network of more than 10, mobile workers. George has more than 20 years of leadership experience dedicated to high-growth companies in the mobile telecommunications and financial services industries, spanning startups to global industry leaders.
George played a senior role in the formation of Verizon Wireless, leading the IT product development and strategic planning team. Linda Erkkila is the general counsel and executive vice president for Safeguard and oversees the legal, human resources, training, and compliance departments.
Linda previously served as vice president and attorney for National City Corporation, as securities and corporate governance counsel for Agilysys Inc. Joe has been in a wide variety of roles in finance, supply chain management, information systems development, and sales and marketing. Steve Meyer is the assistant vice president of high risk and investor compliance for Safeguard.
He also works directly with our clients in our many outreach efforts and he represents Safeguard at a number of industry conferences each year. Steve joined Safeguard in as manager over the hazard claims team. He was instrumental in the development and creation of policies, procedures and operating protocol.
In , he assumed responsibility for the newly-formed high risk department, once again building its success. Steve was promoted to director over these two areas in , and he was promoted to assistant vice president in Steve is a graduate of Grove City College.
Jennifer Jozity is the assistant vice president of operations, overseeing inspections, REO and property preservation for Safeguard. Jen has demonstrated the ability to deliver consistent results in order audit and order management. She will build upon these strengths in order to deliver this level of excellence in both REO and property preservation operations.
Jen joined Safeguard in and was promoted to director of inspections operations in and assistant vice president of inspections operations in Jennifer Anspach is the assistant vice president of finance for Safeguard. She manages recruitment strategies, employee relations, training, personnel policies, retention, payroll and benefits programs.
Additionally, Jennifer has oversight of the accounts receivable and loss functions formerly within the accounting department. Jennifer joined the company in April as a manager of accounting and finance and a year later was promoted to director.
She was named AVP of human capital in Prior to joining Safeguard, she held several management positions at OfficeMax and InkStop in both operations and finance. Jennifer is a graduate of Youngstown State University. Rick Moran is the assistant vice president of application architecture for Safeguard. Rick is responsible for evolving the Safeguard IT systems.
Rick has been with Safeguard since Prior to joining Safeguard, Rick was director of enterprise architecture at Revol Wireless, a privately held CDMA Wireless provider in Ohio and Indiana, and operated his own consulting firm providing services to the manufacturing, telecommunications, and energy sectors.
Steve Machovina is the assistant vice president of technology infrastructure and cloud services for Safeguard. He manages all technology engineering staff who support data centers, telecommunications, network, servers, storage, service monitoring, and disaster recovery.
Amended Coun. P Add Comment. The following buildings and structures are declared to be public nuisances subject to abatement proceedings under Section 14A : A building or structure found to be vacant and open after the effective date of an order to secure and enclose issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or the Department of Administrative Hearings within the previous 12 months, unless stayed by a court of competent jurisdiction.
A building or structure found to contain any violation of the Chicago Construction Codes or Chicago Zoning Ordinance that is imminently dangerous and hazardous. A building or structure for which the costs of repair necessary to bring the building or structure into compliance with applicable laws would exceed the market value of the building or structure after repair , or where the owner cannot show that the owner has readilyavailable and sufficient assets to make the necessary repairs , or where necessary repairs otherwise are economically infeasible.
A building or structure where the owner has failed to correct violations of the Municipal Code that form the basis of an order or judgment involving that building or structure , issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or a hearing officer of the Department of Administrative Hearings, within 60 days of entry, unless such order or judgment has been stayed by a court of competent jurisdiction. A building or structure subject to enforcement proceedings by the City , and whose owner is identified as a building code scofflaw or problem landlord pursuant to Section of the Municipal Code because of violations that caused such enforcement proceedings.
Where the building official determines that a building or structure is a public nuisance, the building official is directed to notify the Corporation Counsel. The Corporation Counsel is authorized to bring an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to abate a public nuisance as described in Section 14A If the court finds that the City has established by a preponderance of the evidence that the building or structure identified in the notice is a public nuisance as described in Section 14A The court's order of abatement may include, but is not limited to: correcting all code violations; altering, repairing, or improving the building or structure , rendering the building or structure fit for human use or habitation; vacating or enclosing the building or structure ; or demolishing the building or structure.
The court may also appoint a receiver; authorize a lienholder to take possession of the property to abate the nuisance; or, if requested by the Corporation Counsel and reasonable in light of the magnitude of the harm caused or which can reasonably be expected to be caused by the nuisance, the market value of the property in its current condition, and the extent to which the owner has failed to take effective measures to abate the nuisance, the assignment to the City or to a third party designated by the City or forfeiture to the City of all of the defendants' rights, title, and interest in the real estate.
There is a rebuttable presumption that the issuance of an order of forfeiture or assignment of all of the defendants' rights, title and interest in the real estate is appropriate for any property that is determined to be a nuisance under Items 1, 2, 4, or 5 of Section 14A Any property assigned or forfeited to the City under this section may only be disposed of as authorized by the city council.
For any building or structure that is a public nuisance subject to abatement proceedings under this section, the owner must be fined in accordance with Section 14A for each day the nuisance has existed until the nuisance is abated.
The amount of any fine imposed under Section 14A in a proceeding involving a building or structure that is a public nuisance, any cost to the City for repairs , alterations , improvements, vacating and enclosing, or demolition, and the costs to the City of bringing an abatement proceeding are recoverable from the owner , are a lien on the property upon which the building or structure is or was located, and are enforceable against any person against whom the order of abatement issues, as provided by law.
Any lien created under Section 14A
0コメント