Collective punishment should be a thing of the past, especially when it impacts communities already facing such harsh inequalities.
Campaigners also believe the ruling could have serious implications for the police, crime, sentencing and courts bill, which they say could criminalise the lifestyle of GRT Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities.
Roma, Gypsies and Travellers. This article is more than 5 months old. Campaigners have attributed the gulf between estimates and records to a reluctance to self-identify, for fear of discrimination — but the effect has been to make the community invisible. In seeking to assess the needs of the community, for instance, consultants often fail to contact those who have already been forced into brick and mortar due to a lack of pitches.
This creates a vicious cycle in which fewer people are accounted for and, in turn, provided for. They also reveal where provision has plummeted to nothing since the removal of the legal protections in In boroughs such as Enfield and Lewisham, for example, large sites were closed when they fell inside local regeneration schemes in the late 90s, leading to bitter legal disputes and the eviction of families from pitches they had been on for decades.
This change was designed to prevent the community getting planning permission on green belt land, a politically contentious issue in some UK cities. Mahoney used to travel, but settled in Tower Hamlets in so that her four children could go to school; she now has 12 grandchildren.
The changes in legislation were a factor in her decision, she says. The EHRC is trying to challenge the redefinition on a number of different grounds, including that it is discriminatory to people who cannot travel due to disability or long-term illness, but so far they have been unsuccessful.
Then their world collided with the 21st century. Despite persecution, Gypsies established themselves, finding niches in both town and countryside, sometimes being protected by landowners who found them useful as a supply of casual labour, for entertainment and sometimes simply by the inconsistent application of the law.
Rather than being polar opposites, however, we might understand these stereotypes as two sides of a coin — as the product of a tendency to view Gypsy lives through the lens of the preoccupations and assumptions of mainstream society — rather than being grounded in reality.
Whether articulated positively or negatively these stereotypes stem from the assumption that Gypsies were irredeemably separate from the rest of the population. Yet, contrary to these stereotypes, Gypsies and Travellers traded with, worked and lived alongside the rest of the population: an analysis of the traditional songs sung by Gypsies and Travellers, for example, shows significant overlap with those current in wider society, suggesting a high degree of interaction between the communities, particularly in casual agricultural and seasonal labour.
Gypsies lived in peri-urban encampments or even cheap lodging in cities over winter alongside working-class populations, making and selling goods, moving in regular circuits across the countryside in the spring and summer, picking up seasonal work, hawking and attending fairs.
As one gypsiologist, Arthur Symons, wrote in the early 20th century:. The Gypsies represent nature before civilisation As David Mayall observed:.
These half-breeds were said to have inherited all the vices of the Romany and the Gaujo [non-Gypsy] but none of their virtues.
0コメント